Russia
Religion News Current News Items
Dissident Baptist leader dies; movement lives on
BAPTISTS AGAINST THE SOVIETS: CHURCH FREEDOM WITHOUT COMPROMISES
Portal-credo.ru,
23 October 2007
On 15 July 2007 Gennady Kryuchkov died; he was one of the most
courageous Christian leaders who would not cave in to the repressive
machine of the communist state. In our time of moral and religious
relativism and opportunism Kryuchkov and the Council of Churches of
Evangelical Christians-Baptists (CCECB), in whose creation he played an
enormous role, remain rare and hitherto unequaled examples of profound
faith, principle, and boldness.
Soviet policy in the religious sphere was filled with contradictions
and the most amazing situations, which would not be possible in a
normal, free, democratic society. Sometimes it is completely impossible
to understand what the builders of communism thought to gain by doing
some improbable operation.
Within the framework of the All-Union Council of Evangelical
Christians-Baptists (AUCECB) believers who had never been able to unite
in a single union were united by the efforts of soviet bureaucrats from
the Council for Religious Affairs and security forces. For the sake of
creating a loyal union the authorities forced Pentecostals to renounce
foot-washing, speaking in tongues, and prophecy. And Christians in the
Spirit of the Apostles (Unitarians), who believe in baptism in the name
of Jesus Christ only and who reject the doctrine of the Holy Trinity,
renounced their own doctrinal principle and began baptizing the name of
the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, upon joining AUCECB. The authorities
managed to unite together Baptists and Evangelical Christians, who from
the beginning of the 20th century had not been able to agree on unity,
despite liturgical disagreements and differences in ecclesiastical
structure. At the same time, forcing them to renounce their
convictions, the soviet state still forbade preaching.
One of the most powerful movements that arose in Russia and set itself
into opposition to this soviet theatre of the absurd was the Council of
Churches of Evangelical Christians-Baptists, a church of believers who
refused to register with the state offices and who often are called
Baptist-Initsiativniki or Reformists. Gennady Konstantinovich Kryuchkov
became the personification of this movement and its leader. He was born
20 October 1926 and died 15 July 2007.
The history of the division of AUCECB began in early 1960, when all the
senior presbyters of AUCECB received a "Letter of Instructions" from
the council of the union. The letter was inspired by the soviet state,
with the goal of increasing pressure on the religious activity of
members of AUCECB congregations. The letter clearly expressed
principles contrary to the protestant frame of mind. It forbade
evangelism, religious instruction, and any forms of religious activity
other than participating in worship services. The senior presbyters
were instructed to stop attracting new members into the community, not
to preach evangelistic sermons, to restrain "unhealthy evangelistic
phenomena," to do no work outside the congregation, to cease baptizing
young people, not to baptize schoolchildren, students, and soldiers,
and categorically to ban from meetings children of preschool and school
age, etc. The instructions contained literally the following words
which should naturally disturb any believer: "In the past some of
our congregations have violated soviet legislation on religious cults
merely because they do not know it well. Thus, there have been
instances of baptizing people younger than 18, providing material aid
from the church treasury, conducting Bible studies and other topical
meetings, permitting recitation of poetry, organizing excursions for
believing youth, creating funds for charity, and conducting meetings
for preachers and classes for choir directors. . . . Now it is
necessary to exclude all of this from our activity and to act in
accordance with existing legislation."
In fulfilling the assignment of the authorities, the supreme leadership
of AUCECB was attempting to act through senior presbyters, although
many did not submit to the orders of the letter. A great role in the
opposition to the AUCECCB leadership was played by members of the
Baptist union churches who were dissatisfied with the close and
hypocritical cooperation with the state. In addition, the movement of
protest within AUCECB was supported by Baptist groups that had been
existing previously as independent, illegal societies that did not join
any union. According to G. Kryuchkov, since 1956 the Lord had begun
opening ways for the brethren to extract the Union of Evangelical
Christians-Baptists from the crisis in which it found itself.
Officially the Initiative Movement was born 13 August 1961, when an
Initiative Group declared a protest against the Moscow leadership. It
stated in sharp terms that the bylaws of 1960 reflected antievangelical
principles. The authors of the protest wrote: "In our days the
leaders of AUCECB are executors of Stalin's will." In April 1961 in the
church in Uzlov (Tula province) an "Initiative Group for Convocation of
a Congress" was formed. The first meeting of the Initiative Group
occurred in Moscow on 10 August 1961, with only four persons
participating. With their first letter of the Initiative Group for
Convocation of a Congress of ECB, the participants in this meeting
dispersed throughout the country for discussing this problem in the
provinces. From the start the leaders of the Initiative Movement were
A.F. Prokofiev and his aide Boris Zdorovets. After their arrest in 1962
the group was led by Gennady Kryuchkov and Georgy Vins (Vins soon
afterward was convicted and subsequently, after protest by the world
community, was sent directly from the prison camp to America). The
Initsiativniki expressed their dissatisfaction with the actions of the
AUCECB leadership and tried to conduct an all-union congress, which was
not provided for in the Statutes of AUCECB from 1944. When the frequent
appeals to AUCECB did not produce results the group began acting
autonomously and sent to all the congregations their own letters of a
critical nature. The Initiative Group suggested to all who had not
joined the AUCECB in apostasy from the truth that they withdraw from
the union. In February 1962 the Initiative Group formed the Orgkomitet
(Organizational Committee) for Convocation of a Congress, which
frequently sent petitions to the Council for Religious Affairs of the
Council of Ministers of USSR. On 25 February 1962 the Orgkomitet
of Initsiativniki sent a letter of warning to the leadership of AUCECB,
giving them time for consideration. However on 2 June 1962 AUCECB
responded with an open letter that said that the actions of the
Initsiativniki were inspired "by the enemy of God." After this the
Orgkomitet excommunicated the AUCECB leadership. This protocol No. 7
was signed by G.K. Kryuchkov, A.A. Shalashov, and N.G. Baturin.
By 1965 about 100 congregations with more than 10,000 believers had
left AUCECB for the union of ECB churches formed by the Initsiativniki
(CCECB). The 39th all-union congress of AUCECB, held in October 1966,
was unable to change the situation. Despite the rescinding of the
Letter of Instructions, the adoption of other by-laws for the union,
and the effective repentance and acknowledgement of error in caving in
to the authorities on the part of the leadership of the official union
of ECB, CCECB declared that to cooperate with AUCECB would mean to
cooperate with atheists. In 1966 Yakov Zhidkov addressed the congress
of AUCECB and asked for forgiveness for his part in drawing up the
by-laws of 1961 and secret instructions, although the Initsiativniki
did not accept this concession. The union of the Initsiativniki began
living an independent existence and categorically refused to register
their congregations. By way of implementing their urge for preaching,
CCECB published literature that the Initsiativniki distributed free of
charge and conducted tent evangelism.
In May 1966 Initsiativniki organized a public demonstration in Moscow
in front of the Central Committee of the Communist Party in order to
draw the attention of the authorities to themselves, for which all of
the participants, including Gennady Kryuchkov and Georgy Vins, were
arrested. The most famous ministers of CCECB (effectively all of the
leadership), who were constantly pursued by police and security organs,
went over to an illegal existence and dispersed throughout the country,
visiting and nurturing the congregations. For teaching children,
publishing literature, and conducting prayer meetings, about 1,000
persons were repressed by security organs. People who were members of
the Council of Churches had to conduct worship services in forests, the
wilderness, and other sparsely inhabited places, hiding from alien
eyes. During the years of soviet rule, congregations of Initsiativniki
acquired a withdrawn nature. Their pastors shielded their
members not only from punitive actions of the state but also from the
influence of secular culture. Just about everything was controlled: the
manner of conduct and clothing style. Stern moral standards and careful
attention to observing all demands of the CCECB by the brethren in the
congregations sharply distinguished the Initsiativniki from the "union
Baptists."
The uncompromising position of the Initsiativniki evoked their
persecution on the part of the state. The Council of Churches
engendered a multitude of uncompromising martyrs for the faith who did
not wish to submit to the dictates of the state. In Tashkent one of the
leaders of the Initsiativniki, Nikolai Khrapov, who had already been
imprisioned for his faith for 25 years, received another seven-year
term in 1961. He had been printing a samizdat magazine "Vestnik
Spaseniia" [Herald of Salvation]. In Barnaul of Altai territory Pastor
Nikolai Khmara was brutally martyred. It was after his death in 1963
that a Council of Prisoners' Relatives was formed, associated with the
name of Lidia Vins and Galina Rytikova. In the years of the existence
of the Council of Churches, around 30 brothers died in confinement,
among them N.P. Khrapov, B.T. Artiushchenko, Ya.F. Dirksen, and I.M.
Ostapenko. Even very elderly persons among the Initsiativniki were
confined to prison (S.T. Golev, P.A. Serebrennikov). After prison, P.F.
Zakharov, N.G. Baturin, poet Nikolai Melnikov, and others again worked
within the brotherhood.
Baptists-Initsiativniki soon became a part of the general dissident
movement of the Soviet Union, which was one of the first manifestations
of protest against the soviet system. Initsiativniki began maintaining
constant contacts with rights organizations. In 1976, immediately after
the creation of the Moscow Helsinki group, Baptists turned to this
group with a complaint about removal of children from believing
parents.The Moscow Helsinki group issued a document on this matter,
"Concerning repression of religious families." On 5 December 1976 Petr
Vins, the son of Pastor G. Vins, who had been exiled from USSR,
participated with a group of youths in a traditional demonstration by
rights defenders on Pushkin square in Moscow. They threw a bouquet of
red carnations to Andrei Sakharov, who had been surrounded by security
agents. In 1977 Petr Vins became a member of the Ukrainian Helsinki
group.
All the way up to 1988 CCECB operated illegally. Gennady
Kryuchkov appeared openly at a congress of CCECB only in 1989 in
Rostov-on-Don. Until then believers had feared new persecutions and
thought that merely short-term, counterfeit freedom had arrived. In the
words of one of Kryuchkov's coworkers, Mikhail Khorev, who spoke at his
funeral in Uslov, Kryuchkov lived "in a small, unnoticed house, in the
attic, from 1970 to 1989. I was there with him. Four or five sisters
were with him, engaged in publishing work. And he had nine children!
His daughter said yesterday at the funeral: 'I envied those children
whose fathers were in prisons. They could be visible when they went for
a visit. But it was impossible for us because of surveillance. Some
suggested that we travel to father's house.' Some left the country,
emigrating to where it was better. But it was necessary to be where one
is more needed, where God has placed him. The great struggle begun in
1961 was not over. But since God began it, he will also bring it to
completion."
It was thanks to Gennady Kriuchkov that CCECB both afer Perestroika and
after the fall of the Soviet Union remained a movement that was
extremely conservative, closed to the world and refusing registration
with the authorities. In the 1990s new converts began joining the
congregations just as in soviet time as a result of preaching on street
corners, in schools, and hospitals, and the distribution of free Bibles
and CCECB magazines in tent evangelism. The Council of Churches
unfurled a massive evangelistic campaign in a majority of the regions
of Russia and even conducted their own national mission among peoples
of the Far North.
Confronting the liberal and modernized (both in ideology and in methods
of work) American evangelistic missions and preachers, the
Initsiativniki feel mistrust and nonacceptance of the western missions
as a whole. They even fear sending their representatives to study
abroad. The Initsiativniki are convinced that western protestants are
bound to a corrupt culture that flourishes in this world. At the same
time, Initsiativniki cooperate with a few conservative western
organizations. For example, with the West Germany Fridenstimme mission,
which invites Initsiativniki to their conferences and helps them with
literature. For the same reason the Initsiativnniki are negative about
the ecumenical movement.
The distinguishing trait of adherents of CCECB still remains rejection
of all contacts with the state and involvement in any political
questions, because, in their opinion, this inevitably confronts
believers with the problem of submitting to illegal, if not atheistic,
requirements from the state. Baptists of the Council of Churches think
that AUCECB was created with the help of the authorities on the
foundation of a criminal agreement by those brothers who had been freed
from prison specifically for this. The Initsiativniki from the soviet
era do not permit any state registration for their congregations. They
have developed a firm conviction that this is a means of state pressure
on the congregation. Separation from the world is facilitated by
another trait that comes out of the soviet period. Literally from 1961
Initsiativniki have had to operate conspiratorially and to hide from
the authorities. In order to strengthen their loyalty and the
strengthen simple believers who are ordinary workers, maintaining faith
in God, the Initsiativniki have developed the conviction that they
alone live a proper life in accordance with the Word of God, and
cooperation with the authorities and with the world is beneath and
unworthy of a Christian. This was necessary for life in the underground
and in an illegal condition as well as, what is probably most
important, withstanding persecution on the part of the authorities.
Many specifically got into conflict with representatives of the police
and went to jail several times. Now the Initsiativniki state that they
are prepared for new persecutions if they occur. Some of them do not
expect that and they are not striving for it, but other say that the
armistice with the state has been dragged out too long.
The refusal of registration with the state has acquired mystical,
theological significance for the activity of the church. The same thing
has happened in another protestant movement which had refused
registration, the United Church of Christians of Evangelical Faith
(Pentecostals) [OTsKhVE]. Unregistered Pentecostals began organizing
their union back at the end of the 1940s in Ukraine, and in Russia the
organized unregistered OTsKhVE brotherhood became active at the start
of the 1970s, led by Russian bishop Ivan Fedotov. If Gennady Kryuchkov
hid in believers' atics for 18 years without seeing his family, Ivan
Fedotov endured hard time for 18 years. The OTsKhVE, like CCECB, thinks
that the church is a spiritual organism and thus registering it is
interference in the internal life of the church and evidence of
worldliness. However, unlike CCECB, where despite the wishes of the
leadership individual congregations have dared to register, Fedotov's
church found its own way out in the 1990s and began intentionally
registering missions within churches.
Religious freedom, which believers acquired at the end of the 1980s,
has radically changed the fate of many religious associations:
AUCECB effectively fell apart and in its place appeared the Union of
Baptists, the Union of Pentecostals, and autonomous evangelical unions
that are independent from the Union of Baptists. One could have
expected that CCECB, under Gennady Kryuchkov's leadership, also could
come out of the underground and begin a new stage in the history of the
initiative movement. However, an opening to the world on the part of
Kryuchkov's CCECB has occurred only partially. Initsiativniki began
freely conducting their evangelistic activity, as they did previously
in the soviet era; periodically conflicts with "union Baptists" have
arisen, who dislike criticism against them for stealing believers, and
with authorities who, like in the Brezhnev era, have tried
unsuccessfully to control the meeting of people in private homes. One
can say that up to the present no kind of liberalization has touched
CCECB. The pious Christian must by all means avoid the world that is
lying in sin and the unrighteous secular state. In the postsoviet
period Initsiativniki have inevitably rethought the history of the
Baptists of the soviet period, while the image of AUCECB in the eyes of
conservatives of the old breed has acquired an even more evil contour.
Initsiativniki do not recognize any of the congresses of AUCECB and
thus they think that there has not been a free congress of Baptists
since 1926. And the congress at which the creation of AUCECB was
declared is described in the magazine of the Baptists of the Council of
Churches in this manner: "The powers that be, following their own
designs, sought in the prison camps surviving ministers, set them free,
and suggested: create a religious center. These agreed and declared: a
Union is organized! But the initiator was not the Lord and not
children of God."
On one hand, in the 1990s Initsiativniki enticed believers out of the
Union of Baptists, which they even now think is the heir of the
criminal AUCECB. In connection with sharp criticism on the part of
CCECB, the leadership of the Union of Baptists sent out in 2004 a
statement "Concerning the departure of the Council of Curches from the
doctrine of Evangelical Christians-Baptists." It noted that, while they
consider CCECB believers as their brethren, "we are forced to conclude
painfully that the Council of Churches has not responded to our
suggestions and in many regions of Russia is conducting work directed
to the destruction of our congregations and in several matters has
departed from the teaching of the Bible and the bases of the doctrine
of Evangeical Christians-Baptists."
On the other hand, CCECB itself has ceased to be in the postsoviet
period a monolithic association. Some of the churches began making
contacts with "union Baptists." Thus, after 2000 the Rybinsk
congregation in Yaroslavl province, headed by Presbyter Evgeny
Leonidovich Kravtsov, left CCECB and became an autonomous church more
open with regard to "union Baptists." Pastors of the Russian
Union of Evangelical Baptists (RSEKhB) preach in the Rybinsk church and
former Initsiativniki participate in conferences and seminars conducted
in Yaroslavl by the association of RSEKhB.
Very important significance for the process of changing the image of
the Union of Baptists resulted from the election of Yury Sipko as
president of RSEKhB in 2002, who has acquired the reputation of a
courageous and principled religious leader who has dared to express
criticism both with respect to the state's attitude toward individual
rights in Russia and with respect to the clerical initiatives of the
Russian Orthodox church. Sipko was one of the first religious leaders
who responded to Kryuchkov's death. In his condolences Sipko
said: "Gennady Konstantinovich devoted all his life to the
service of God, the church, and his family. To his lot fell many of
life's trials, which he overcame with honor, dignity, and profound
faith in the Lord, and he remained faithful to Christ and his church.
He firmly and selflessly enduring the horrible time of the war, years
of soviet persecution, and he raised nine children. We know and
bear witness that Gennady Konstantinovich's life was an example of
service to the Lord and it bore fruit."
That Kryuchkov's heroic activity still led to essential changes in the
circumstances of Christians churches in contemporary Russia is stated
in the obituary written by the International Council of ECB Churches
(around 2700 congregations in Russia and CIS; in Russia there are
around 400 congregations and groups), that he led for more than 30
years. It stresses the role of the founder of the church and his
accomplishments: "For Gennady Konstantinovich, the words of Jesus
Christ himself, 'If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also;
if they observed my word, they will observe yours also' (Jn 15.20) were
extremely precious. The blessed promise of the Savior was accomplished
to the glory of the Lord who redeemed us in the independent brotherhood
to the fullest extent:
--the antievangelical restrictions and prohibitions introduced by
AUCECB workers were rescinded;
--the all-union congress of ECB churches, which had not been permitted
for 36 years and for which believers had petitioned, was held;
--the publishing house "Khristianin," independent of the world was
organized by Gennady Konstanntinovich and printed the New Testament,
Bible, and other religious literature, which forced the powers that be
to permit even the official AUCECB to produce literature;
--numerous free societies of Christian youth in the persecuted
churches, where hundred of young souls were converted to God, forced
the powers of this world to remove restrictions on youth in the
registered congregations also;
--the bloodly legislation on religious cults of 1929, that directly
contradicted the basic law of the country, the Constitution, which
believers asked to rescind, was rescinded."
Meanwhile, Baptist Initsiativniki continue to suffer discrimination on
the part of the authorities, primarily in the provinces during the
conduct of tent outdoor evangelism and distribution of literature. In
addition, officials of law enforcement agencies often disperse Baptists
who gather in private homes without registration and without giving any
notice to the authorities. Doubtless these persecutions do not at all
compare with soviet repressions, when believers' children were taken
away and they were imprisoned. Current suspicions and attempts to
restrict the activity of CCECB are evidence of the fear of bureaucrats
in the face of a powerful organization of believers who did not give
way to the soviet state machine, did not want to live by the rules of
atheists, and maintained a degree of freedom that was unique in the
time. The existence of strong movements that are autonomous and
independent from the state has so far been viewed by representatives of
the state as some kind of danger, but in postsoviet Russia, as before,
it is not the believers who are afraid, but their persecutors. None of
the persecutors has ever understood why Gennady Kryuchkov preferred not
to see his own family and children for 18 years but to methodically
build up a church organization with strict discipline and evangelists
who traveled all over the Soviet Union. As the founder of Keston
Institute, Michael Bourdeaux, noted in his obituary for Kryuchkov in
the British paper "The Guardian," "all his life Gennady Kryuchkov was
firm in faith and turned out to be stronger than the KGB." (tr.
by PDS, posted 23 October 2007)
Russia
Religion News Current News Items
Protestants in Far East Russia feel discrimination
REPRESENTATIVES OF CIVIL AUTHORITY OF REPUBLIC OF SAKHA IGNORE FIRST
CONGRESS OF YAKUTIA EVANGELICAL CHURCHES
Slavic Legal
Center, 19 October 2007
Representatives of civil authority of the republic of Sakha (Yakutiia)
continue to ignore the evangelical churches and their positive effect
upon society. This was reported to the press service of the Slavic
Legal Center by the deputy director of the Association of Evangelical
Christian Churches of Yakutiia, Valentin Nikonenko. On 15 October in
the city of Yakutsk the First Congress of Evangelical Churches of the
Republic of Sakha (Yakutiia) was held. Around 200 delegates and guests
participated in the work of the congress. The theme of the congress was
"The Evangelical church and its role in the life of the republic of
Sakha." Ministers who gave addresses belonged to a great variety of
denominations: Evangelical Christians, Pentecostals, and
Evangelical Christians-Baptists. A representative of the Consultative
Council of the Heads of Protestant Churches of Russia, Pavel Timchenko,
participated in the work of the congress.
Speakers at the first Yakutiia evangelical congress touched on the
topic of the social problems of society and means for resolving them
from the positions of the evangelical churches. In particular, the
pastor of the "Benediction" church, Dmitry Cherviakov, described in
detail the work of protestant congregations among prisoners. The
congress adopted a resolution in which the evangelical churches
expressed a united position with regard to the social and evangelistic
ministry in the republic of Sakha.
In his letter sent to the Slavic Legal Center, Valentin Nikonenko
noted: "It is no secret that representatives of the civil
authority in the republic of Sakha (Yakutiia) ignore the evangelical
church, as such, and also the positive effect on society that it has.
Thus one of the goals of this congress was an attempt to draw attention
of the public of the republic to the reality of the existence and
activity of the evangelical church in Yakutiia. Unfortunately, despite
an invitation, the state structures were not officially represented at
this congress."
The Slavic Legal Center has previously reported that the Interagency
Commission on Matters of Religious Associations of the Republic of
Sakha has taken an aggressive position with regard to all religious
minorities of the region, and its representatives do not hide the fact
that they intend to support the Orthodox church only in the republic.
That the "sectarians" only divide society and supposedly act in
accordance with the policy of USA has been expressed in speeches and
interviews by both the vice-chairman of the Commission on Matters of
Religious Associations of the republic of Sakha, the director of the
Department for Affairs of Nations and Federal Relations, A.V. Migalkin,
and the executive secretary of the commission, Afanasy Nikolaev.
At the end of 2006 sharp criticism on the part of the commission was
directed not only against Pentecostals but also Evangelical Christians
and representatives of the Association of Evangelical Christian
Churches of the republic. On 31 October the heads of the
protestant churches appealed to the president of Yakutiia with regard
to a conference on the "Bases for the spiritual security of the Far
Eastern region" that was conducted on 24-25 October 2006. In their
appeal to the president of the republic, Viacheslav Shtyrov, leaders of
evangelical associations expressed their alarm with regard to the
active participation of the state apparatus in the conference, where
anticonstitutional calls for a struggle with "sects" and missionaries
resounded, along with calls for introducing "Foundations of Orthodox
culture" into the schools and an antisectarian policy was declared to
be a necessity for assuring "spiritual security." The appeal of
the protestant churches was signed by the head of the Association of
Evangelical Christian Churches, M.P. Trubchik, the head of the Council
of Churches of Christians of Evangelical Faith, V.V. Fedoseenko, the
head of the Churches of Seventh-day Adventist Christians, M.V.
Avramenko, and the director of the regional association of the Russian
Church of Christians of Evangelical Faith, D.N. Petrov.
The authorities' reaction to the letter of the evangelical believers
turned out to be unexpected. On 27 November 2006 the director of the
Department for affairs of Nations, A.V. Migalkin, in an official answer
to members of the protestant churches leveled the accusation that
evangelical believers were themselves exerting pressure of government
offices and were discrediting the "traditional" religion, that is,
Orthodoxy. And then on 5 December 2006 the Federal Registration Service
conducted an investigation of the Association of Evangelical Christian
Churches of the republic of Sakha. At the same time, an official of the
republican FSB directorate, N.N. Ignatiev, and an official of the
Department for Affairs of Nations and Federal Relations of Yakutiia,
I.I. Prokopiev, tried the conduct an illegal inspection of the
Association. (tr. by PDS, posted 22 October 2007)
Russia
Religion News Current News Items
ALEXANDER CHUBARIAN: "HARMONY BETWEEN STATE AND CHURCH SHOULD NOT
BE DISRUPTED
Religiia i SMI, 18
October 2007
The director of the Institute for World History of the Russian Academy
of Sciences, Alexander Chubarian disagrees with the opinion of his
colleagues, the authors of the "letter of the ten," to the effect that
in Russia society is "being deluged by clericalism."
"We have an abundance of moral problems. The church may participate
usefully in the rebirth of moral and ethical values, and this is in
accord with society's expectations. Despite strong polarization, it
basically welcomes this idea," Chubarian stated in an interview
published Thursday in the "Izvestiia" newspaper.
He stated that he does not see anything bad "when the church, as
Metropolitan Kirill said, does not want to be outside society and is
seeking its own 'niche.'"
"Harmony in the relations between the secular authority and the church
must not be disrupted. The main thing is to follow the constitution,
according to which the church is separated from the state. At the same
time one must not forget that morality of society greatly depends upon
the morality of the authorities," the academician added.
According to Chubarian, although morality is a "historical category,"
is "nevertheless is several generally accepted, unchanging principles
which were enunciated well back in the Bible." (tr. by PDS,
posted 22 October 2007)
Russia
Religion News Current News Items
IN WESTERN UKRAINE NUMBER OF PROTESTANT CONGREGATIONS CATCHES UP WITH
ORTHODOX
proUA, 19
October 2007
In Volyn, Rovno, and Chernovits provinces the number of congregations
of protestant churches has equaled the number of parishes of Orthodox
churches. This was reported today during a conference by the first
vice-chairman of the State Committee of Ukraine for Religious Affairs,
Nikolai Novichenko, according to a report by a "proUA" corresondent.
"Three provinces are effectively 'fifty-fifty': Volyn, Rovno, and
Chernovits. This is effective equality between Orthodox and protestant
churches. In first place are the Evangelical Christians-Baptists and
the Christians of Evangelical Faith Pentecostals," Novichenko
said. (tr. by PDS, posted 22 October 2007)
Russia
Religion News Current News Items
OFFICIALS AND SECT FIGHTERS INCREASE PERSECUTION OF BELIEVERS OF
APOSTOLIC ORTHODOX CHURCH AND THEIR CHILDREN IN VARIOUS SETTLEMENT OF
THE REPUBLIC OF BURIATIA.
Slavic Legal
Center, 9 October 2007
Local authorities, prosecutor's offices, and representatives of the
Chita and Transbaikal diocese of the RPTsMP have intensified
persecutions of believers of the Apostolic Orthodox Church (APTs) of
the Far East and Siberia, which has existed since the beginning of the
1990s on the Baikal-Amur Mainline (BAM), the press service of the
Slavic Legal Center reports. Hounding of members of the church began in
2000, when a church building was set on fire in the settlement of
Taksimo, of Muisk district of the republic of Buriatia, where one of
the largest parishes of APTs is located. In addition, articles of an
antisectarian nature began appearing, in which parishes of APTs were
accused of religious extremism and nationalism. Whereas earlier in
newspapers produced in Taksimo, Severobaikalsk, or Ulan-Ude
representatives of the Buriatia deanery of the Chita-Transbaikal
diocese called APTs simply a "sect," now a great variety of accusations
against the believers are being advanced, including even criminality.
As the vice-chairman of the church council of APTs, Irina Tissen, told
the SLC press service in an interview, not one of the lawsuits
regarding protection of honor and dignity has yet been accepted by the
courts. On various pretenses, for example, that a suit has supposedly
been drawn up incorrectly, the church's claims have not been admitted
either in Taksimo, where the society of APTs is registered, or in
Ulan-Ude city court, where the newspaper that published material
offensive to believers is located.
In Taksimo, leaflets of antisectarian contents are regularly
distributed, in which APTs is mentioned, and the church is accused in
the press of "zombeeizing" people and of totalitarianism and drug
distribution. According to Irina Tissen, the chief "sect fighter" of
the Buriatia deanery of the Chita-Transbaikal diocese, Priest Mikhail
Litvinov, who is the director of the Informational Consultation Center
on Problems of Sectarianism in Ulan-Ude, regularly comes to Taksimo
with statements. Fr Mikhail Litvinov is one of the authors of the
article "Apostolic church tries to return BAM to itself. APTs initiated
an international scandal with regard to infringement of its rights in
Buriatia," in the "Nomer odin" newspaper (28.11.2006). The article,
which was written on the basis of Fr Mikhail's words, appeared
immediately after publication of a press release of the Slavic Legal
Center, "Apostolic Orthodox Church reports that its believers of being
subjected to persecution in republic of Buriatia" (02.11.2006)
The article in "Nomer odin" maintained, in particular: "In its
totalitarianism, according to priests, APTs does not lag behind the
notorious White Brotherhood of Vissarion." As Irina Tissen noted,
subsequently similar articles appeared also in 2007, although the
church still has not been permitted to refute Fr Mikhail Litvinov's
accusations in legal proceedings. Earlier, in this same
newspaper, Fr Mikhail Litvinov accused the Pentecostal "Word of Life"
church of "zombeeizing" people and causing psychological
disorientation. In its turn, APTs began distributing statements about
discrimination with regard to its believers on the part of the
"twenty-first century inquisition."
According to Irina Tissen, what is especially troubling is that
throughout all the time of APTs' existence the children of members of
the church have suffered from antisectarian accusations. In the
schools they announce who is Orthodox and who is not and what church
the parents of school children attend, following the statements of Fr
Mikhail Litvinov and other priests of RPTsMP. Very often in fights boys
stand up for their rights to be Orthodox believers, and not sectarians,
Irina Tissen emphasized. Children of members of APTs churches are
compelled to participate in classes of "Foundations of Orthodox
culture" that often lead to arguments with the teachers, because the
children who attend APTs churches know very well the teaching and
liturgy of the Orthodox rite.
Besides this, the officially registered APTs churches are constantly
subjected to inspections on the part of various state agencies. There
are regular fire inspections in the churches. In Taksimo an inspection
was conducted by officials of the Federal Registration Service, who
noted that APTs was subject to investigation by the Federal Security
Service.
We recall that the first congregation of APTs arose in 1991 in
Severobaikalsk quietly, when believers who had decided to become
Orthodox gathered together, prayed and read the Bible. The founder of
APTs was a priest of the catacomb church, Fr Anatoly Zhoga. For some
time APTs existed autonomously, and then it turned to the Old Believer
church of the Belokrinitsa Accord. Some members of the first
congregation organized a church that entered the jurisdiction of the
Moscow patriarchate. APTs accused members of the RPTs parish of moral
impurity, and in their turn believers of RPTs declared that the
Apostolic congregations were extremist "sects." For several years APTs
was under the omophorion of Old Believer Bishop Siluian until it was
revealed that the liturgy and strict church life of APTs did not
correspond to Old Believer tradition fully. Parishes of APTs were
thrown out of the Old Believer Church, although Bishop Siluian still
managed to consecrate two priests for APTs parishes. Originally APTs
churches were scattered along the Buriat branch of BAM, where there
still were not any parishes, including RPTsMP, although rather quickly
they spread beyond the borders of Buriatia and groups of APTs began to
appear mainly in the territory of Krasnoiarsk and provinces of Chita
and Irkutsk. At the present time, APTs has 8 officially registered
societies and more than 20 groups. In 2007 there remained parish
complexes in Taksimo, Severobaikalsk, Uoian settlement and the village
of Ust-Mue. While six churches in the villages of Tunka, Mue,
Ulkan, Angoe, Umbell and Kuanda were either demolished or seized by
authorities and turned over to dioceses of RPTsMP for use.
Illegal congregations exist in large citiesÑKrasnoiarsk, Irkutsk,
Cheliabinsk, and Moscow. Since 2004 the Apostolic Orthodox Chruch has
been a member of the Russian centralized organization "Association of
Orthodox Communities of the Apostolic Tradition." APTs is headed by a
church council consisting of laity chaired by Archbishop of Irkutsk and
Ulan-Ude Dionisy (Vladimir Agapov). (tr. by PDS, posted 10 October 2007)
Background article:
ORTHODOX PRIESTS TO FIGHT SECTS
by Anna Maveeva
Nomer odin,
31 March 2004
The Information Consultation Center for Problems of Sectarianism has
begun its work in the city of Ulan-Ude. The purpose for its creation is
to inform and consult with people whose relatives and neighbors have
fallen under the influence of totalitarian sects and destructive
pseudoreligious organizations. The organizers of the center are
Orthodox priests. Although the center has been operating only a few
days, already people have turned to the priests for help.
Priest Mikhail Litvinov: "We are prepared to help people whose
relatives and neighbors have become victims of sects.
"Today a man came to us. His wife has for two years now been a member
of the 'Word of Life' neo-Pentecostal sect," the director of the
center, Fr Mikhail Litvinov says. "In these two years the woman's
behavior has changed a great deal, and her psychological health has
caused serious concerns for her relatives. The man also reported that,
despite the modest income of the family, every month his wife pays a
tithe, that is, one tenth, of the family's income into the treasury of
the sect. None of her relatives knows what to do, and this is why they
decided to turn to us, and we are trying to help as much as we can."
According to Fr Mikhail Litvinov, the chief weapon in this case is
giving to the head of the family complete information about the
activity of the particular sect, and how it "zombeeizes" people, and to
explain what kinds of counteractive resources exist. In ideal
circumstances it is planned to meet with victims of sects themselves.
But as the saying goes, it is easier to prevent than to heal, and
therefore the center's priority is prophylactic interviews with people.
In this regard priests of the center are prepared to deliver lectures
on the subject of sectarianism in educational institutions of the city,
if such a request comes from the education board. This already has been
done. Quite recently in the village of Turuntaevo a class was
conducted for school children on this topic. The children were told
about all the pseudoreligious organizations existing on the territory
of Buriatia and about how to avoid being drawn into them. (tr. by PDS,
posted 10 October 2007)
Russia
Religion News Current News Items
Moscow-Constantinople quarrel over Estonia renewed
RUSSIAN CHURCH DELEGATION QUITS SESSION OF COMMMISSION ON
ORTHODOX-CATHOLIC DIALOGUE BECAUSE OF DISAGREEMENTS
Interfax,
10 October 2007
A delegation from the Moscow patriarchate departed on Tuesday from the
meeting hall of the Joint Commission on Orthodox-Catholic Theological
Dialogue, whose session opened yesterday in Ravenna (Italy).
"Upon arrival in Ravenna, the Orthodox delegates discovered that
representatives of the so-called 'Estonian Apostolic Church,' created
in 1996 by the patriarchate of Constantinople on the canonical
territory of the Moscow patriarchate, had been included in their
group," the head of the Russian church representation in Europe, Bishop
of Vienna and Austria Ilarion, who is a member of the commission, told
"Interfax."
He noted that representatives of EAC were invited by a co-chairman of
the commission, Metropolitan of Pergama Ioann (of the Constantinople
patriarchate) "as a unilateral action, without consultation with other
local Orthodox churches."
"I sincerely regret the situation that was created. Constantinople is
positioning itself as the guarantor of inter-Orthodox unity; however
the steps they took, unfortunately, have harmed this unity," the bishop
emphasized. (tr. by PDS, posted 10 October 2007)
Russia
Religion News Current News Items
Deputies and religious leaders do not support draft law on uniform
state standard
The reform of education may again come to a halt. This time the
impediment has been prepared by deputies, regional education officials,
and Orthodox clergy. Yesterday at a round table in the State Duma they
criticized a draft of a law regarding a federal state educational
standard that was prepared by the Ministry of Education and Science.
Round table participants were supposed to prepare and deliver to the
state secretary of the ministry, Yury Sentiurin, their amendments for
the second reading, but instead they advocated its entire rejection.
The draft law was approved on first reading on 11 September. Its
essence consisted in the following. There now is in Russia an
educational standard comprising three componentsÑfederal,
national-regional, and internal to the educational institutions.
Because of this imbalances often arise between the required and
elective disciplines: some places they teach regional studies too much
and other places they teach religious studies. The new draft law
introduces a federal standard for all accredited institutions. It
provides for uniform requirements for exam results, the structure of
the disciplines, and the conditions of teaching. At the same time it
stressed the freedom of the institutions themselves and of local
authorities to formulate curricula taking into account national and
regional peculiarities.
"This will permit the establishment of uniform requirements for the
curricula. Thus, nobody will be deprived of the right of Chechnya to
teach the foundations of Islam, but graduates of the local schools will
have to take the same examinations as residents of other Russian
regions. Let them make the choice themselves," Yury Sentiurin explained
to a "Gazeta" correspondent.
However a majority of those present at the round table did not support
the draft law. The chairman of the Krasnodar Legislature Committee on
Questions of Education, Science, Family Affairs, and Youth, Viktor
Cherniavsky, declared that if classes on studies of the Kuban and
Foundations of Orthodox culture are abolished, then "school children
will cease being interested in the history and culture of their native
territory."
The first vice-chairman of the Duma Committee on Education and Science,
Communist Oleg Smolin, was worried that adequate budgetary support will
not be provided for implementing the draft law. "According to experts,
the cost of the law is 25-30 billion rubles. Without this money it is
impossible to work out the new curricula, and to write, to say nothing
of printing, new resources and textbooks," he declared. However,
Sentiurin cited the conclusion of the government that supplementary
means are not required.
Orthodox clergy defended the foundations of religion. "If some
places they teach the foundations of Orthodox culture, that is within
the framework of the regional curriculum. In addition, at the very same
times they are teaching such an important discipline as the national
language. And it is preferable to conduct this on the basis of the
school curriculum," Boris Danilenko, director of the library of the
synod of the Moscow patriarchate, complained to "Gazeta;" it was as if
he had not listened to Sentiurin's claim of the freedom of schools and
local authorities in the structuring of the curricula. Only the
president of the All-Russia Fund for Education, Sergei Komkov, made a
serious argument and pointed out the error in the ministry's
calculation, which still has not prepared a sample text for the
standard: "Really, we need to have existing standards for a
serious review. But before adopting the law, it is necessary to
understand just what, specifically, the government and ministry want to
change." The chairman of the State Duma Committee on Education, Nikolai
Bulaev, reported to a "Gazeta" correspondent that no fewer disputes are
roiling the committee. Therefore they will not manage to review the
document on second reading any sooner than one and a half to two months
from now. (tr. by PDS, posted 4 October 2007)