The impact of subtle discrimination on students is profound. As noted above, "small slights" perpetuate practices that devalue women, marginalize women’s experiences, and result in the omission of women from the curriculum. Including women in the curriculum is critical: we need to be attentive to how new work on women and gender throughout the disciplines might be better integrated in the Stetson curriculum, not just concentrated in some disciplines. (To do otherwise is to fail to introduce students to exciting new work that is reshaping knowledge throughout the curriculum.) But attending to the "unofficial" education that our students receive--both in and out of the classroom is also crucial. If a faculty member consistently use the "generic" masculine pronoun to characterize persons of high status, he or she sends a powerful message to both male and female students about the place of men and women in the world; if faculty do not include work by women they send the message that women are not active contributors in that field of study. Faculty who ask male students the more challenging questions or who devote more time to responding to male students’ questions are not preparing their male and female students equally for the challenges they will face in their professional lives. The work we’ve discussed above on gender socialization and subtle forms of discrimination suggests that faculty may not even be aware of the possibility that they treat male and female students differently. Given the long-term consequences of subtle discrimination, it is important that the university promote a greater awareness of these issues among the faculty.
proceed
to the next section of the report
return to the
table of contents