BY 498 Senior
Project
Dr. Peter May
RESEARCH PROJECTS
ON AVIAN ECOLOGY OF EMERALDA BIRDS
Introduction: You have expressed an interest in
performing your senior research project using existing, unanalyzed data
collected over the past four years at Emeralda Marsh Conservation Area, in
The data and
methodology:
Beginning January, 2000, I have been surveying birds once a week at EMCA.
Censuses generally begin 15 to 5 minutes before sunrise, and always no later
than 30 minutes after sunrise. I drive a regular route that traverses most of
Area 3 (the
My census therefore
covers only a relatively small portion of the total range of habitats present
at EMCA. I directly survey Areas 3 and 5 (see attached map); my census
route covers Area 3 far more completely than Area 5. My coverage of Area
5 consists only of the levee road south of the Yale Canal, extending between
Emeralda Island Road to the west and Rte. 452 to the east (~ 1.8 miles)..
From this vantage point, I can scan much of the impoundments in Area 5 to the
south and in Area 7 to the north, as well as the terrestrial habitats closer to
the levee. In Area 3 (the Lake Griffin Flow-way), my census route starts
at the southeastern corner (Wood Duck Parking Lot), and traverses about 9 miles
of levee roads through the flow-way and on the perimeter of the area.
This includes the 4.3-mile long
I estimate numbers
of each species of birds in six sectors that I recognize based on habitat
differences (roughly indicated on attached map). All census data are subdivided by the sector
in which they were collected. Brief descriptions of each sector are as
follows:
A - 0.75 miles - Beginning at Wood Duck Parking Lot, this area comprises
primarily successional fields and hammock, with dredged roadside ditches along
most of its length.
B - 1.15 miles - a mixture of habitats, including some successional
field, wetlands, and hammock islands.
C - 1.8 miles - the southwestern perimeter of the Flow-way, with mostly
marsh and wetland habitat to the east, and hammock and creek/canal habitat to
the west. A corridor hammock of hackberry and red maple is present along
much of the levee itself, and there is generally a dense swath of elderberry
and other shrubby vegetation on the Flow-way side. This part of the route
parallels Haines Creek for much of its length; Haines Creek returns water from
the Flow-way to
D - 2.75 miles - These two levee roads cross the middle of the Flow-way,
and include mostly marsh/wetland habitats and a large amount of open
water. The east side of the the levee crossing the Flow-way from east to
west (
E - 1.75 miles - This levee is the northern boundary of the Flow-way,
and includes a small amount of cypress swamp at its southwest corner. The
rest consists mostly of marsh and open water habitat to the south, and
canal/impoundments to the north.
F - 1.8 miles - The western half of this levee crosses former pasture
land, and the eastern part is between two large shallow-water
impoundments. Along most of its length, the
Surveys generally
take between 4 and 6 hours, depending on the number of birds present and their
distribution. The specific sequence in which the middle sectors (C
and D) are visited varies somewhat to acommodate 1-way traffic while the
driving route is open, but in general, the first 1-2 hours of the survey are
spent in the southern sectors (A and B), the next 2-3 hours are spent in C and
D, and the final 1-2 hours are in E and F.
Birds are identified
by sight and sound, and approximate numbers of each species are
estimated. For widely ranging birds that might move between sectors,
individuals are counted as different individuals each time they are seen unless
the bird is clearly one that has been seen before elsewhere. Therefore,
for some wide-ranging species, such as Northern Harriers, for example, total
daily counts may be overestimates of the total number of birds present.
My primary aim in collecting data in this way is to document which specific
areas of EMCA are being used by different species, and to provide a consistent
index of how many birds are present that can be compared between dates, rather
than obtaining absolute counts of numbers of birds present (which for most
species is probably a futile endeavor for a single observer conducting strip
transects).
Species that are
consistently seen in reliable numbers for at least part of the year include:
Pied-billed Grebe Great
Crested Flycatcher
Double-crested Cormorant Eastern
Phoebe
Anhinga Empidonax
sp.
Great Blue Heron Tree
Swallow
Tricolored Heron Barn
Swallow
Snowy Egret Purple
Martin
Great Egret Blue
Jay
Cattle Egret American Crow
Little Blue Heron Fish
Crow
Green Heron Tufted
Titmouse
Black-crowned Night Heron Carolina
Wren
Least Bittern House
Wren
American Bittern Marsh
Wren
Yellow-crowned Night Heron American
Robin
Black-crowned Night Heron Hermit
Thrush
Wood Stork Northern
Mockingbird
Glossy Ibis Gray
Catbird
White Ibis Brown
Thrasher
Mottled Duck Blue-gray
Gnatcatcher
Blue-winged Teal Ruby-crowned
Kinglet
Northern Shoveler Red-eyed
Vireo
Green-winged Teal Blue-headed
Vireo
Gadwall White-eyed
Vireo
American Wigeon Northern
Parula
Ring-necked Duck Prothonotary
Warbler
Fulvous Whistling Duck Black-and-White
Warbler
Black-bellied Whistling Duck Orange-crowned
Warbler
Wood Duck Yellow
Warbler
Turkey Vulture Yellow-throated
Warbler
Black Vulture Yellow-rumped
Warbler
Osprey Prairie
Warbler
Bald Eagle Palm
Warbler
Red-shouldered Hawk Northern
Waterthrush
Red-tailed Hawk Ovenbird
Northern Harrier American
Redstart
Cooper’s Hawk Yellow-breasted
Chat
Sharp-shinned Hawk Common
Yellowthroat
American Kestrel Cedar
Waxwing
Limpkin European
Starling
Sora Northern
Cardinal
Purple Gallinule Blue
Grosbeak
Common Moorhen Painted
Bunting
American Coot Indigo
Bunting
Black-necked Stilt American
Goldfinch
Killdeer Savannah
Sparrow
Least Sandpiper Swamp
Sparrow
Ring-billed Gull Song
Sparrow
Bonaparte’s Gull Lincoln’s
Sparrow
Forster’s Tern White-crowned
Sparrow
Caspian Tern White-throated
Sparrow
Northern Bobwhite Bobolink
Ground Dove Red-winged
Blackbird
Mourning Dove Boat-tailed
Grackle
Chimney Swift Common
Grackle
Belted Kingfisher
Northern Flicker
Pileated Woodpecker
Red-bellied Woodpecker
Downy Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Sapsucker
The available data would support projects dealing with
distribution, seasonal dynamics, or ecological distribution of any of the above
species or well-defined taxonomic groups (wading birds, waterfowl, raptors,
warblers, sparrows, etc.)
What the student
must do: It
is your responsibility to come up with a biologically meaningful question or
hypothesis to address with these data.
The range of topics possible is broad; basically any ecological question
that can be addressed with population estimates of one or more species
collected over short time frames (weekly), medium time frames (seasonally), and
longer time frames (between years) is possible.
Questions might deal with population dynamics of individual species or
taxonomic groups, or larger community-based questions of overall diversity and
its relation to season, habitat, environmental characteristics, etc. If you feel completely lost in coming up with
a question, you don’t know enough about the general sorts of questions asked by
ecologists and ornithologists, and you need to do some background reading
(either texts or primary literature) on the general topic or specific group of
birds you find most interesting. Once
you have chosen a question, you must be proficient with data entry and analysis
(or be willing to become proficient).
The data entry, manipulation and analysis are your responsibility.
What I will do: First and foremost, I provide the data. I’ll also give you guidance in selecting the specific subsets of data you will need once your topic is chosen, designing a plan of attack for entering and analyzing the data, and assist you in interpretation of the results obtained. I’ll also help you with accessing and assimilating the literature in the topic field you have chosen, and in the writing and revising of the final senior research report.