Management 305/K.
Hansen/Take-Home Glossary and Managerial Dilemma Test SAMPLE
100
points
NOTE: This is a sample ONLY. Your exam will contain an actual list of
glossary concepts to define and a different Managerial Dilemma
Part 1: Glossary. Choose 15 of the
following management terms (from Chs. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 14 of your
text) to define.* You may wish to choose terms that you feel will be
personally useful for you to know in the future. The idea is to
maintain a glossary of the management terms you are most interested in
learning.
You MAY wish to use the Concept Map
of this test to guide your thinking. You are NOT required to fill in
the Concept Map, nor to provide ALL aspects of the Concept Map in your
definition. The Concept Map is simply a tool to help develop your
definitions.
Your *definition must include the
following:
Pitfalls
of previous students:
Glossary portion: The best
tests cite outside sources for the definition portion. Some students
really struggle
for examples; I suggest looking at academic journals when you can't
find any other examples. Your example should provide solid context for
the concept so that a layperson reading your example could get a good
sense of the meaning of the concept.
Case-dilemma portion:
1. Don't just summarize the case; ANALYZE it. I will be looking
primarily for thoughtful analysis. There's no point in
repeating/summarizing stuff I already know from reading the case.
2. Try to find a "hook" to use to organize your response. For example,
in the Coolburst sample herein, one student did a SWOT analysis on
Coolburst. If you can find an organizing principle for your response,
it will have much better flow and logic. Responses should be thought
out logically. For example, it doesn't make a lot of sense to jump into
developing new Coolburst flavors until you've developed new strategy for
marketing and distribution to new market sectors.
3. Lack of support for ideas. For example, some students have had good,
creative ideas/solutions to the Coolburst dilemma but have not
substantiated them with any support from the text or outside sources.
The best responses provide this substantiation.
4. Dig deep. Avoid a superficial treatment of the case. Think about
answering the questions "why" and "how"
for your ideas/solutions.
Length: About a paragraph per
concept (see sample below).
Grading: 3 points per concept X 15
= 45 points
Sample definition:
Concept: First-line manager
Definition: A first-line manager
supervises employees who aren’t part of higher levels of management,
although Colin Hales (2005, Journal of Management Studies) notes that
“as a consequence of radical organizational change, the role of
first-line manager (FLM) has shifted from supervision to team
leadership/co-ordination or business unit management.”
Example: TJ and Sandar Larkin argue
in their 1994 book, Communicating Change, that change is most
effectively communicated to first-line workers by first-line managers –
rather than to the workers directly. The authors’ research also shows
that communication from middle and top managers to first-line workers
is not effective.
Concepts from which to choose
(choose 15) (Your exam will have the actual concepts listed here. This
sample is provided for illustrsative purposes only):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
Part 2: Managerial Dilemma: 55
points: Note this is a sample managerial dilemma from last semester.
Yours will be different.
- Read the following Case
Study, “What’s Stifling the Creativity at CoolBurst?”
- In 2-3 pages (preferably
typed, double-spaced) answer the basic question the case poses at the
end:
- How can Luisa Reboredo
foster creativity in her current employees and nurture creative
individuals who join the company in the future?
- Drawing from the textbook,
your own experience, and perhaps other sources, consider also these
questions (you don’t have to address all of these, nor are you limited
to these):
- What are the existing
organizational and leadership strengths at CoolBurst?
- What are its weaknesses and
vulnerabilities, especially in terms of the competition?
- How would you characterize
CoolBurst’s organizational structure?
- How close to collapse would
you speculate CoolBurst actually is?
- How could Reboredo
dramatize to her employees the company’s precarious situation?
- What are some ways
CoolBurst could respond to increasing competition?
- How would you assess
Blatts’ attitude that “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it?”
- What is Reboredo’s attitude
toward change? Does she need to shift that attitude?
- To what extent does it
strike you as odd that Reboredo is the CEO yet wonders why CoolBurst
isn’t growing? Compare this situation with the cluelessness discussed
in the Reframing chapter you read.
- To what extent does
Reboredo herself need to change as a leader? Does she have what it
takes?
- Reboredo works long, hard
hours and is obviously loyal to the company. Is she using her long
hours at the office effectively?
- How well does Reboredo
understand CoolBurst’s customers?
- What does CoolBurst need to
keep in mind about its customer base (school-age children)?
- What new markets could
CoolBurst tap into?
- Should Reboredo bring in
new blood? Will it be enough to do so? How can she attract fresh
thinkers to an organization that seems stuck in its ways? What effect
will new creative thinkers have on existing employees?
- Consider how you might view
this case from the perspective of the “frame” revealed as dominant in
you (structural, human resources, political, or symbolic) by the
Leadership Rating you completed early in the semester.
- How could CoolBurst’s past
successes, culture, and heritage be applied/linked in a positive way to
build the future? What would you do to update the culture, if you feel
that’s desirable?
- Management is very
controlling at CoolBurst. How would you strike a balance between the
accustomed control and the level of freedom that might stimulate
creative ideas?
- In what part of CoolBurst
does creativity belong?
- Consider doing a Google
search on “intrapreneur” (not “entrepreneur”) and examine how the
concept might apply to this case.
- How might planning and
goal-setting enter into your recommendations for this case? What kind
of planning would be most effective?
- What issue should Reboredo
tackle first? How quickly (if at all) should she attempt to change the
CoolBurst culture?
- What do you think of
Jenkins’ tendency to take off in the middle of the day to go to the
movies to get his creative juices flowing? If you find that practice to
be a productive tendency, how could it be tapped companywide? Should
Reboredo consider bringing Jenkins back to the company?
- How could Reboredo use
Carol Velez to help the current situation?
- Are there outside resources
Reboredo could consider bringing in to address the growth stagnation?
What kinds of resources?
- How could Reboredo generate
greater creativity among existing employees? How could she stimulate
“buzz” that would get employees thinking in new directions?
- How will employees react to
being challenged by difficult, interesting problems?
- Would you recommend a new
performance review and reward system for employees?
- What kinds of interactions
with the Chicago parent company should Reboredo consider?
- If you were an executive
with the parent company, would you replace Reboredo?
